The cradles of electronic music part 8

(excerpt from my e-book “New Concepts for Music and Sound”: https://www.dev.rofilm-media.net/node/537)

Experiment 3

In both experiments the composed parts contained rather simple timbres and sound developments – let´s say to “keep our musical feet on the ground” - whereas Ongaku delivered more complex sonic goings on. And the individual parts, the composed one as well as Ongaku´s answer – were rather long, not a real dialogue.

New Concepts for Music And Sound – Part 4

(Excerpt from my e-book about this topic: https://www.dev.rofilm-media.net/node/537)

What was so groundbreaking about the goings on in Cologne and Milano (and Paris and London, and....) in the 1950s? What was it that makes us call this early electronic music “revolutionary”? What´s all the fuss about anyway? Why should I care about Boisselet, Stockhausen, Eimert, Madera, Berio, Krenek, Cage and, and, and? Why isn´t it wasting of time to study these old guys when I´m indeed looking for new concepts NOW?

Widget